Introduction to the Course
Week 1: Prophetic Messenger
Week 2: Felling of Pride
Week 3: Renewed Judgment
Week 4: Divine Word
Week 5: Vindication and Deliverance
Week 6: Agents of God's Redemption
Week 7: Servant and Bride
Week 8: Arm of God
Agents of God’s Redemption – Discussion Questions
Questions for Discussion:
1. In Isa. 44:23 Second Isaiah speaks of the idea of God’s family and grounds the idea of redemption in a family context. Israel has been part of God’s family since its beginnings, and that relationship has not changed because of the exile. How do Christians fit into this picture? They too claim to be part of God’s family and trace their own redemption to that fact. Yet Second Isaiah implies that Israel’s family status has not come to an end. How do all of these things fit together (for one New Testament view on this, see the comments of Paul in Romans 9—11).
2. In Second Isaiah membership in God’s family implies that God will fulfill the obligation of redemption within the family. Does Second Isaiah also imply a similar obligation for members of the family toward each other?
3. To the long list of human agents of the divine will that Isaiah mentions, the passages being considered in this section add the Persian king, Cyrus, who is given God’s support and sole political control over Israel. Do you think that God uses non-Israelite/non-Christian agents to accomplish the divine will? Is there a limit to the various sorts of servants that God might use?
4. In Isa. 45:6-7 Second Isaiah not only stresses yet again an absolute belief in monotheism but also states clearly the implications of such a belief. If God is the only power in the cosmos, then God must be responsible for evil as well as for good. What are your reactions to Second Isaiah’s conclusion? Are there alternatives to the prophet’s position?
5. Second Isaiah’s frequent references to God’s divine plan for world events suggests a belief in a kind of determinism in which all events in history have been planned from the beginning of creation. In Second Isaiah’s context this view is intended to offer Israel reassurance that God’s promises of restoration will inevitably take place. Is the idea of a divine plan still a viable one today? Is it possible to believe in one God without accepting a deterministic view of historical events?
Create an account to enroll in our free courses, track your progress and take part in the discussion